ABSTRACT
Coronary stenting for long complex lesion is effective but associated with complication. We compared the results of stenting between with multiple conventional stenting group (group A) and with single long stenting group (group B). Fifty patients were prospectively and randomly enrolled: 25 patients for each group. Each group showed no significant differences of clinical characteristics. One patient died of heart failure in each group, not associated with the procedure itself. One patients had cerebrovascular accident in each group. Five patients had major bleeding (2, group A; 3, group B). Angiographic success rate was 100% in each group and procedural success rate was 96% and 100% in group A and B, respectively. Angiographic and clinical restenosis rate at 6 months follow-up were 60%, 36% in group A and 65%, 44% in group B, respectively (p=S). Multivariate analysis showed that several factors affected the angiographic restenosis rate as follows; a) male gender (M:F=76.9%:25.0%, P<0.001), b) AMI (AMI:stable angina pectoris=72.7%:66.7%, P<0.001), c) lesion length d) residual stenosis. In conclusion, there were no statistical differences of restenosis and complication rate between the two groups. Our data support single long stenting is acceptable and economically more favorable for long diffuse lesion, compared to multiple conventional stenting.